The Price of Fuel
The price of biodiesel just went up. Just as everyone is clamoring for cheap fuel. Our phones are ringing off the hook, not out of interest in renewables, but from pressure from petroleum pricing.
The price of biodiesel is painfully easy to explain, once plugged into the classical laws of supply and demand, but for some reason, those laws shouldn’t apply to the average American’s fuel costs.
The other day at lunch I was telling Evan that I thought we should double our price, from 3.50 to 7.00 a gallon. He was mortified. He felt it was “counter-intuitive.” But my logic was that if we can’t supply anyone with fuel for 3.50 a gallon, why not double it and not supply anyone for 7.00?
When President Bush signed the Jobs Creation Act last fall, our phone started ringing from people saying “Now that there are tax credits in place, when is your price going to drop?”
At the time, it was an easy answer: “Nothing kicks in until January—I doubt you will see price reductions until then.”
In January our phones were ringing with “Now that you can get 1.00 per gallon off, when are we going to see that at the pump?”
That answer was trickier, as we explained the IRS had not yet interpreted the new law, and that no one was going to cut price until they saw revised forms and rulings on how the tax credit would impact their operations. We told them that they might see some price reductions in the spring.
Now that the forsythia are fading and the dogwoods are starting their show, our phones ring off the hook with “The price of petroleum is outrageous, when are we going to see cheaper biodiesel?”
And today are answer is the price just went up. We are holding our selling price at 3.50 a gallon, and we do have some fuel on hand, but forget about making any money by selling it at that price.
Those on the edge of the industry are outraged. They mention conspiracy, and claim our suppliers are “greedy bastards,” and would love to cite their constitutional right to cheap fuel. Too bad the founding fathers left that part out. My understanding is they felt markets were an efficient way to deliver goods to those in need.
North Carolina is the fifth largest biodiesel consuming state in the country. Its state contract stipulates that the fuel sold here will come from soy. And the state contract has been awarded to World Energy in the west, and Potter Oil in the east.
We are in the middle, and tend to buy from World Energy. World Energy cannot ship non-soy based fuel into North Carolina, since most of their customers are buying on state contract. Potter Oil gets a lot of its supply from West Central Soy, who has customers on allocation right now.
Apart from an idiotic state contract—that really should be feedstock neutral, why are there shortages of biodiesel right now?
And the answer comes back to tax credits, the price of petroleum, and the Policy Layer. Some suppliers, including West Central Soy, have passed along a 1.00 per gallon savings to their customers. In some instances that has put their price at the rack (the terminal where fuel is wholesaled) at a lower price than diesel fuel.
Diesel fuel is high right now based not only on 57.00 per barrel crude on world markets, but also on increasing demand from both China and India. Their economies have a higher percentage dependency on diesel fuel in the first place, and as they grow, they are competing with the U.S. for fuel. I should also point out that a lot of the costs in the production of biodiesel come from petroleum in the first place. The boats that import soy beans from Brazil are powered by petroleum, as are the trains and tank trucks that deliver B100 to market. I’ve even seen grassroots biodiesel operations use petroleum to get their work done.
In those instances where biodiesel is cheaper than petroleum, it gets snapped up by the general public, rather than those dedicated to biodiesel. Construction fleets, cement makers, and transportation intensive industries of all types—the same ones who were previously afraid to let B2 touch their precious engines, are buying biodiesel to reduce their fuel costs.
Since I am quick to blame the “Policy Layer” for setting the price of energy, I should say that progressive legislation in Minnesota and Illinois has also contributed mightily to demand. Minnesota did it with a mandate for biodiesel usage in state vehicles, and Illinois has done it with a tax holiday.
And with that demand, biodiesel is in shortage mode.
All of which doesn’t fundamentally answer the question of when will the price of biodiesel fall? Simple: when there is a surplus.
Biodiesel pricing will come down when petroleum demand eases (if it ever does). Or when the production capacity in this country increases. Before people freak out about their God-given right to cheap fuel, they need to realize that this is how the industry is birthed. One of the reasons Europe has a biodiesel industry, while ours is merely fledgling, is that governments there used policy levers to make biodiesel more economical than petroleum.
And as for production capacity? We are working on it.
Posted by Lyle at April 6, 2005 09:11 PM
Comments
You guys all caused quite a stir at tdiclub.com- I think a few people didn't get the joke about $7 a galllon and started discussing the blog and it's comments in detail:
http://forums.tdiclub.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=998839&page=0&vc=#Post998839
Mark
Posted by: girl mark | April 21, 2005 09:34 PM
I must concur with Robert, I think that too much legislation and red tape is ahead of us in this fight. However if we were attack this at the micro production level, our goal of being both price and cost effective would easily be acheived. Additionally a portion of the coalitions profits "could" go to support a Lobby at the State level with the ultimate goal in mind of mass production.
Posted by: Pete Parson | April 11, 2005 01:19 PM
The fact that large scale biodiesel production costs are linked with petro costs (from transportation to fertilizers and pesticides) seems to indicate even more the validity of local micro-scale production. I still feel a coalition of micro-producers could assemble into a single entity, provide for Tier 1, and get into legal production. Local feedstock, from local waste, independent of transportation/production costs related to petro, will continue to give local production a cost advantage as petro prices rise.
Posted by: Robert Del Bueno | April 8, 2005 09:33 AM
Want to make you aware of a highly complimentary product for biodiesel blends. The Rentar Fuel Catalyst, allows biodiesel users to burn blended fuels more efficiently with further reductions on emissions.
The Rentar reduces bio blend NOx levels to below straight number two diesel and reduces fuel use by 6-10%, both results were achieved at Aberdeen Proving Ground using the EPA Rover. We also have a state contract with Delaware for its state DOT fleet and also agricultural applications.
Michael Gray
Marketing Director
Rentar Environmental Solutions Inc.
www.rentar.com
mgray@rentar.com
516.779.6461
Posted by: Michael Gray | April 8, 2005 08:36 AM
Taurus-
From an energy-efficiency standpoint, electricity is about the worst way to heat anything in your home. Say you get yoru power from a natural gas power plant. The power plant is about 40% efficient (at best). Transmission losses to your home average about 5%. Say you use electricity to heat your house. Electric furnaces are 100% efficient, because they dont need a flue, so 100% of the energy goes into heating the air in the home. The overall system efficiancy is 38%. If you used that natural gas in a modern furnace, your overall efficancy is about 80%, since modern gas furnaces are about 80% effcient, and there is no loss in transmitting gas to your house (hopefully). So in the electric scenario, for each watt of heat that goes to heat your home, you need 2.63 watts of natural gas. In the gas scenario, you only need 1.25 watts of natural gas. Bottom line is, if everyone switched from electric to natural gas, you could heat twice as many homes as if they all had electric heat. Talk about conservation.
-Joe
Posted by: Joe Stecher | April 7, 2005 03:21 PM
I was having a conversation with a neighbor the other day about what energy source to use in the house.
My house is mainly electric (hot water heater, stove, heat pump) although we have a propane insert for heat in the winter and to run an outdoor grill. He was a big fan of all electric, and he had a pretty interesting reason.
While we don't have a right to cheap fuel, electricity prices are much more stable, almost to the point of having a right to steady power prices. The suppliers of electricity are not allowed to pass on fluctuations in the cost of producing energy (at least in North Carolina - and yes, I'm ignoring the built in profit from legislation such as CWIP).
It was something I hadn't thought about before.
-T
Posted by: Tarus | April 7, 2005 09:31 AM